Assessing an #EvidentlyInspiring Symposium

By Quinn Grundy, Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Sydney

#EvidentlyInspiring? #SystematicallyEngaging?  #CollaborationSensation? In the weeks following the recentAustralasian Cochrane Symposium, I’m absorbing the experience and attempting to capture it in a hashtag that will be retweeted across the globe proclaiming that #evidencematters!

As a first-timer at a Cochrane meeting, I found it so refreshing that some of the biggest issues facing evidence-based health care were discussed openly and tackled seriously. We could both indulge our inner-nerd with the latest methodological advances in tools, tech and statistics, and explore head-on ‘the beasts’ threatening health care worldwide: conflicts of interest, overdiagnosis and the problem of too much medicine. Presenters highlighted that Cochrane’s commitment to independence and the production of high-quality, relevant and useable reviews could ensure the preservation of public trust in evidence and encourage its uptake by decision-makers.

If you couldn’t be there in person, here are some of the highlights that I took away:

And finally, be on the lookout as headlines touting the latest Cochrane review will soon grace your morning paper or digital media fix. In the final rousing Symposium session, we witnessed three brave Cochrane authors put themselves under the spotlight to pitch their research to former ABC journalist Ray Moynihan and fellow media insiders from the Herald Sun and The Conversation. The takeaway message? Little did we know it, one of Cochrane’s favourite conclusions, ‘this intervention probably doesn’t work’, could actually be front-page news in the near future. We look forward to reading all about it!